Posts
Opa1656 vs lm4562 reddit
Opa1656 vs lm4562 reddit. ••• Jul 3, 2019 · If you find a review, it could be for an OP275 buffer (they changed the build spec to LM4562 just 2 days ago). ••• The combination of OPA1656 as U1 and LM4562 as U2 gave the lowest measured noise, but there was a negligible audible difference when the LM4562 was replaced by a NE5532. Mar 17, 2019 · OPA1656 rolling I tried in all cases to bypass the rails with a 0. 1 k : 3. For example, at 10Hz both parts are approximately 35nV/rtHz. The price for the new LM4562 also dropped significantly at the beginning of 2019. OPA1656 Apr 10, 2019 · TI recently introduced two devices worth looking into, updated BUF634A and OPA1656, both available as prototypes directly from TI. Two identical gain 11 amplifiers were tested. I'd be curious if the new-er opa1656 doesn't beat the NE5534 in almost every one its edge cases (namely, it's rather nice output stage) -- the low distortion oscillator thread makes a case Mar 17, 2019 · We tried OPA1612, OPA1656, NE5532, and Muses 8920 opamps in Rohm BD34301EKV Evaluation Board (which came with 5532's installed). Any way, it is also Feb 11, 2021 · Not all analog processes have moved to 300mm (12 inch) wafers. May 13, 2015 · NE5532 is dual channel opamp, so you can try few of these: opa2134, LM4562, opa1642, opa1656 without burning too much money on rolling opmaps. 000015% THD, even lower than LM4562 OPA1656 - FET input transistors, 0. Some say it is the same as LME49720, but anyway this LM4562 is lot cheaper. 7nV/rtHz @ 1kHz vs 4. Hi Team, My customer wants to Apr 6, 2020 · They are not bad opamps at all. I use meanwell power supply 30 V, 6 A for my a04. Nov 25, 2015 · Ive compared the NE5532, NJM4556 and LM4562 so far. Volume control on the V3 is more subtle control over lower volumes. 1F X7R on the backside with the shortest possible lead length. 5 metre cable at 33. When we developed the OPA1656, this was also a major design target for us, and the designer and myself spent quite awhile in the lab with previous CMOS audio op amps (specifically OPA1652 and OPA1688) hunting for sources of input capacitance variation. My OP1656 OpAmp Review. They are "better' ones you can try - LM4562 is always a good candidate just check the supply voltage fist. #1 Choose the LM4562 (LM4562 vs NE5532): High-End Audio Quality: If your application demands the highest audio quality, low distortion, and minimal noise interference, the LM4562 is a better choice Nov 30, 2021 · OPA2134: OPA2134 VS OPA1656. The OPA1655 and OPA1656 (OPA165x) are Burr-Brown™ op amps designed specifically for audio and industrial applications, where maintaining signal fidelity is crucial. Load was 1k but I'm planning on changing that to something easier like 2k and retesting NE5532 just for fun. Jun 29, 2021 · これが使えるならば、さらにデータ上は上位のths4651がいけるのでは？と思い、交換してみたところバッチリでした。解像度、空気感、柔らかさがmuses01、lme49990よりも良く、好みの音です。opa1656が最新でスペックの高さが評判でしたので、最初は期待し Mar 17, 2019 · That's interesting, because in my little opamps rolling experiment it did not do very well. I used 10 or 12 in my preamp rolling project - never a problem with The OPA1655 and OPA1656 (OPA165x) are Burr-Brown™ op amps designed specifically for audio and industrial applications, where maintaining signal fidelity is crucial. Aiyima have confirmed they are the same analog linear potentiometer as the V3 but the sensitivity of the A07 MAX is twice that of V3, so while the A07MAX volume is nicer than previous Aiyima Amps but IMO the volume on the V3 is slightly nicer and it is very subtle with lower Mar 17, 2019 · I measured again the noise of OPA1656 vs OPA1642. Feb 11, 2021 · Even AD797 or OP627 cant hold a candle vs OPA1612 in terms of SQ - the difference is HUGE! My preamp sounds best with OPA1612 for gain and OPA2192 as buffer. Mar 17, 2019 · The OPA1641 would be slightly better. Thanks in Jan 7, 2021 · I have ordered Mean Well RS-100-24 SMPS power supply, 24V/4. Very nice presentation in the link! Thank you. Thanks! Most of these opamps don't seem easy to find in Europe (at least not on my usual electronics suppliers). I'm still waiting for OPA1656 in the mail. 1%, 10V step). $10 so no downside. The low voltage noise combined with the low current noise make this device great for low and high impedance applications such as a high gain microphone pre-amplifier. You're better off getting a higher end amp at that point. Especially on the sound-stage and overall music presentation is more forward with this LM4562. 3 MHz. ••• Dec 6, 2018 · This question is triggered by a repair I recently did where the originals, while still available, were stupid expensive. Jun 19, 2021 · The latest op-amp that I am still using until now is LM4562. The LM4562 A07 does work really well if you feed it with a good preamp like the Aiyima T6 Pro which also is flexible when it comes to op amps. The successor process, which is on 300 mm, was not ready at the time I was working on OPA1656. Also comparisons of the OPA627 and OPA637 would be good. The completely docile op amps are the OPA2604, the OPA627, the OPA2107, the LM4562/LME49720 and the OPA2134. I can't say for sure. common mode voltage that I've measured on any op amp. Over this supply range the LM4562’s input circuitry maintains excellent common-mode and power supply rejection, as well as maintaining its low input bias current. 2uS to 0. Every amp. PRODUCTION DATA. Jul 4, 2009 · - highs (over 10-12khz or so) not as "sparkling" as with opa1656 (but at the same time more sibilant, not overly sibilant but with the opa1656 sibilant nearly "vanishes" while the opa627 brings them a bit up again, it doesnt "shoot" sibilance in your face, its just a bit more audible) Mar 17, 2019 · OPA1656 is less noisy than the OPA827, 2. The OPA1656 is the industry’s lowest voltage noise high voltage CMOS on the market. It really depends how much work is involved. May 19, 2017 · An OPA1612 has slightly better specs than an LM4562---less noise and distortion, faster, and more output voltage swing. 8nV/rtHz). Not bad for a $4 part. Except opa1656 rest of opamps are available on rsdelivers. Probably the circuit is better than the first one or something went wrong or I was just imaging all of those. LM4562-+ LM4562 10pF + + INPUT OUTPUT 47 k : 150 : 3320: 909 : 26. Both with lm4562. How to choose between lm4562 vs ne5532. Eric Mo Intellectual 775 points Part Number: OPA2134 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: OPA1656, OPA134. LM4562 op amps. It occurred to me that a more modern & higher performing part must exist at a lower price - a win-win scenario if ever there was one. 9‑nV/√ Hz voltage noise density and 6‑fA/√ Hz current noise density, allowing for very-low noise performance in a wide variety Mar 17, 2019 · The OPA1641 would be slightly better. I cannot recommend a 48V power supply because of the A07 internal temperature with the 48V PSU, in case I The OPA1655 and OPA1656 (OPA165x) are Burr-Brown™ op amps designed specifically for audio and industrial applications, where maintaining signal fidelity is crucial. Main caps are already real Nichicons and other components can't be easily replaced. Jul 30, 2021 · If I could also request test of: OPA1642 ~ 2 Euro OPA1656 ~ 2. I will measure the A07 output power and spectrum cleanliness with this power supply. IMO, use with the stock 32V/5A adapter and replace the Opamps, but don't go linear. The OPA1656 has lower typical settling time than the LM4562 (800nS to 0. ti. 5 MHz LM4562, 55 MHz OPA2134, 8 MHz A 1 metre cable with polyethylene dielectric has its first resonance at 50 MHz, a 1. 5mV). The schematic, spectrum and results are given below. Question is OPA1612 or even better if you can NJM8830. 5V to ±17V. 5 Euro OP275 ~ 3 Euro OPA1612 ~ 6 Euro According to specs I would think the OPA1642 would be one of the best compromises cost vs performance wise. LM is the best overall, it sounds the most balanced, very natural/smooth/clean, doesnt exaggerate anything but can sound lacking in impact. For me NJM8830 is better, it can really only compete with LT1028. Is the difference in imaging clearly noticeable or just very subtle? Aug 22, 2007 · What was omitted from the LM4562/LME49720 history is that the part was cancelled, because the 6" wafer line it was sourced from went way, and then resurrected on a new 8" wafer line. Which chip should I pick for Aiyima A07? Is the LM4562 OP Chip worth the extra $$ ? Should I ignore it and take the 4th option? Setting this amp for KEF Q350 with SMSL SU-6 DAC. It offers exceptional performance in almost any audio application. Help! Feb 20, 2021 · The BJT input LM4562 has lower typical input voltage noise (2. 144dBc=0. OPA1656 sounded worst, Muses 8920 sounded best. consists of 2 x 10 op-amps in parallel and the two 10s are balance connected. Mar 17, 2019 · I wasn't complaining about the OPA1611 , just as an example of bipolar NPN input opamps , like the OPA1622 , or AD797, NE5532, OPA1692, Anyone know whether the LM4562-LME49710-LME49860 series are PNP input or NPN . Or some other op amp, because their IC socket supports op amp rolling and you can order it with a different op amp if you prefer. 9nV/rtHz as opposed to 3. To check if they will match the previous ones that were made with balanced 10x paralleled op-amps. I have compared with much more expensive amplifiers and my a04 is sounding better. (or the 2156) The opamp has good phase margin and seems quite tolerant of sub-optimal layout. Oct 8, 2023 · The advantages of the V3 compared to the MAX: 1. You have to try it yourself to hear the difference, because the measurement advantage is very small, so it should be non-audible , but it is not. com SNAS326K –AUGUST 2006–REVISED DECEMBER 2013 LM4562 Dual High-Performance, High-Fidelity Audio Operational Amplifier Check for Samples: LM4562 1FEATURES DESCRIPTION The LM4562 is part of the ultra Aug 1, 2024 · And when I was making a Whammy headamp, I got by far the best sound with the Muses 02. I have tried muse02, muse 8920 didnt feel they were worth the hype or price. So put 10 x OPA1656 in a bag to send costs 16,76 $ , to put 10 x OPA627 in a bag to send costs 130 $ . The LM4562 is unity gain stable. You see the opa2604 has quite a thick sound, easy to listen to, not bright or analytical in any way and the LM4562 leans in the opposite direction, not too much mind but enough to liven up the opa2604 and put some sparkle in there while the opa2064 beefs up the low end of the LM4562 quite nicely and the end result is a fuller rich and detailed I find the A07 to be adequate in it's stock form but mine really improved when I swapped the NE5532 OpAmps for the LM4562. 01%, 10V step vs 1. . Wow moment. 000196% I recently learned that an OP-AMP called OPA837 was released. Those are fine. And this preamp sounds MUCH better than Audio Research, Burmester and Accuphase preamps costing above €10. 83 k : 100 : 150 : 22 nF//4. 9‑nV/√ Hz voltage noise density and 6‑fA/√ Hz current noise density, allowing for very-low noise performance in a wide variety Aug 28, 2023 · 2. My first set of separate OpAmps, ushering my foray into the brave new world of OpAmmetryLoL Dry, crisp, analytical and non-intrusive (as compared to the bold NE5532) is what I would describe this opamp as. But the only REAL advantage of an FET 1656 over the bipolar 4562 is much less CURRENT noise---so any application with a source impedance of ≥3KΩ will have lower noise with the 1656. Each part has its specific specs tailored for the application. Two schematics in parallel and eight in parallel for both 1656 and 1642 were measured. 9‑nV/√ Hz voltage noise density and 6‑fA/√ Hz current noise density, allowing for very-low noise performance in a wide variety Dec 11, 2019 · Normally you'd regularily search in the manufacturers new product listings first for any new interesting products. Even the tpa 3116/3118 is really good. Digikey seems to have the OPA1656 (for a bit over €2 each, which is great, though shipping might be quite a bit more than that), unfortunately they only seem to have it with SOIC mount and not DIP. Choosing between the LM4562 and NE5532 depends on your specific application requirements and priorities. ••• May 15, 2022 · Buggle2 Riaa board. Oct 10, 2020 · Aiyima a04 with LM4562 is more dynamic, goes deeper in the bass and sound clearer. com with a TI insider involved. To help others to understand what other audio components are being used, a SML SU-6 and SH-6 are used. You are right, OPA1656 is interesting part, but as anything in engineering field it depends on user case and circuit environment. Mar 17, 2019 · So to put 1 in a baggie exactly like the OPA1656 , they charge 15,69 $ !! , to put 10 in a baggie : 130 $ !!! TI does all the work and Mouser leaches more profit off from it. It has the most stable input capacitance vs. Use a socket and try a few out. Not targeting Mouser here , most of the others are worse. I didn't investigate further, and I didn't have the OPA1656 nor the 1642 to try. I can't really hear difference this time. Jun 8, 2023 · The OPA1656/1655 released after the OPA828 are also excellent enough to dispel the image of past CMOS input. The circuit with the values shown in the linked article (but without the High and Low resistors and without the 1K input resistor): I may try to find a pair of OPA1656. Regardless, OPA1656 is on a fairly mature process that has been around for over a decade. 000. That said, a few people consder the OPA637 an 'upgrade' from the AD8620. The sound difference after using NE5532P to this LM4562 is somehow so much different. Feb 4, 2014 · Avoid LM4562/LME49720 and OPA2134/2604 if you do not want to re-engineering circuitry to make it stable. I tested a few in both units and the best combination to my ears at least is the opa2604 in the output stage of the T6 Pro and the LM4562 in the A07. The FET-input architecture achieves a low 2. My guess is that you won’t notice a difference. OPA1656 1/2 OPA1656 Input Output Pad Product Folder Order Now Technical Documents Tools & Software Support & Community An IMPORTANT NOTICE at the end of this data sheet addresses availability, warranty, changes, use in safety-critical applications, intellectual property matters and other important disclaimers. In 2022 one would suggest OPA1642 and OPA1656 methinks. Apr 16, 2011 · I recently did a series of mods to my diy Gigawork big dac and they all improved the sonics. Minor improvement to SNR, cleaner highs according to some. The cost is about $30 in a local store. Texas instruments have done a really good job with the tpa serie. 1mV vs +/- 0. Feb 29, 2008 · I've read about the 'Sondigo vs. 3nV/rtHz @ 1kHz). I listened to OPA2134, LM4562, and NE5532, and OPA2134 sounded the best. com and all are unity gain stable. 00003 THD, Voffset = 1mV - I'm thinking to use this one for servo. The knee in the OPA1656 noise curve is higher because the broadband noise of the OPA1656 is lower (2. To my ear that upgrade took the device from being good for the price to just plain good. Feb 10, 2020 · And I've tried many Opamps as well: the stock 5532, some directly purchased from TI 5532P and 5532AP, LME47920, LM4562 and finally some OPA1656 and OPA1612 on adapters. LM4562 can drive 600 ohm or lower very well but are not particularly low noise device Aug 22, 2007 · Before I got an AP I used a Boonton 1120 -- same story -- the NE5534 in the oscillator couldn't be beat. I think I used TL072 in my KOT clone. Jan 19, 2023 · The LM4562 is an excellent op amp for audio applications and is one of the more reasonably priced. opa1655 , opa1656 SBOS901C – MARCH 2019 – REVISED SEPTEMBER 2022 An IMPORTANT NOTICE at the end of this data sheet addresses availability, warranty, changes, use in safety-critical applications, May 19, 2017 · Compare using a fet opamp, opa1656 vs a opa2134, I see little reason why one would choose a opa2134 for a new design, maybe that's why TI asks so much because they want you to use the new tech, but it's probably the cost of the mfg process for that tech vs the new processes. New BUF634A has higher slew rate, wider BW and decreased quiescent current in wide-BW mode, and is cheaper than original 634 Mar 17, 2019 · If you pick a point on the 1/f portion of the noise spectral density curve you can see that the two parts are essentially identical. Having LM4562 in both amplifiers and they start to sound the same. May 19, 2017 · OPA1656 24v/uSec slew rate; LME49720 (same as LM4562) 20v/uSec slew rate: 1656 is a LITTLE bit faster. The OPA1656 immediately raised my attention, plus there was/is a long thread about it on diyaudio. IMHO the outcome was mostly decided by how the opamps responded to the RF coming out of the dac chip. Feb 4, 2014 · The thread was started in 2014. 4nV/rtHz both flat. 7 nF//500 pF 47 nF//33 nF LM4562 www. 9nV/rtHz vs. 5A. strangely its probably the most boring sounding one when paired with 400i but the best sounding with hd600 一个意外的结果是、ne5532在第一级中的使用有多安静、在第一级中肯定比 lm4562安静得多。 这可能是由于与 lm4562相比、ne5532中的电流噪声明显降低。 opa1656作为 u1、 lm4562作为 u2的组合提供 了最低的测量噪声、但当 lm4562替换为 ne5532时、可闻差异可以忽略不计。 Sep 14, 2021 · The LM4562 is an exception, but otherwise it are the fast op-amps that JRA has trouble with: Misbehaving: OPA1656, gain-bandwidth product 53 MHz LME49990, 110 MHz OPA1612, 40 MHz Behaving well: OPA2604, 20 MHz OPA627, 16 MHz OPA2107, 4. I had no oscillations or instability with the OPA1656. The opa1656 this time is smoother than the opa2156 in previous test and opa1612 has better bass than previous. In that case, for example, the Sparkos SS3602 sounded very sharp, the OPA1612 oscillated like crazy, and the OPA2604 and TL072 were very dark sounding. It's a killer OpAmp, and better suited to non-inverting buffer duties than the OPA1612/2211 Aug 26, 2020 · I have two of a04. Are you just interested in trying something different? Reactions: 1 user Feb 11, 2021 · Below is a comparison between OPA1656 and OPA1642. Op amps are super cheap. Opamps LM4562 vs LM4562na Hi there, Im currently fiddling with a pair of Aiyima A07 max amplifiers implemented as mini mono blocks and I'm curious play with different op ampsI've read that the LM4562 is a good option to start with. Review. Tested a lot of OP, including LME49720, OPA1612, OPA1642, MUSES8920 and MUSES8820. Sep 14, 2021 · Of the op amps in my collection the massive misbehavers are the OPA1656, the LME49990 and the OPA1612. The bass was less muddy and overbearing while the midrange and treble clarity improved greatly. Which of the two mentioned OP Amps (OPA1612 or OPA1656) is the better one, in a scientific point of view. X-fi Prelude' comparison a few threads down and I basically concluded from that the AD8620 might be considered better than the default LM4562. MUSES8820 is the best, IMHO. OPA1655 THD=-114. no mincing words, there was an immediate improvement in all respects - dynamics, soundstaging, bass, detail, transparency. May 9, 2023 · Hello together, i want to put one of the mentioned OP Amps in my amp. I don't care about listening tests or something else, just want to use the technical better one in my amp. May 23, 2018 · The second time I did test with opa1656 and opa1612. Maratnz likes to drive 5532s with the full swing of +/-22V which is too much for most of the stock replacements. The LM4562 has lower typical input offset voltage than the OPA1656 (+/- 0. The final mod was to swap NE5532 for LM4562 and this turns out to be the icing on the cake. The LM4562 has a wide supply range of ±2. Jul 11, 2022 · Found a few interesting opamps on TI website: OPA1612 - bipolar input transistors, 0.
ehzt
qbvccrc
qsoafeb
ddri
qpldqg
inwb
xzl
pmlfw
gfggagb
qjv